However, much to my disappointment the weather in England today was horrendous! Overcast skies, rain, poor visibility and the occasional sunshine. Yeah, much like any other day in England really.
Not to be discouraged, I reminded myself that an overcast day is also good for low contrast photography and so, I dragged the family on a photography trip to ... where else? Stratford-Upon-Avon again.
Good 'ol Stratford. Nice place for a photography field day
---
I used fill-flash for this picture to highlight the foreground statue (thanks Uncle De for the tip). It brought out details of the statue BUT looks too highlighted and unrealistic I think.---
---
Experimentations with depth of field, I used an aperture of 5.6 for this picture.
---
---
Finally a picture of the camera shy Amar on the blog!
---
On the way back from Stratford we dropped by the town centre (we're planning something for tomorrow, please look forward to it!). It was still rainy, and the kids were cranky so apart from doing our shopping I wasn't able to take much pictures. That, and because I have already filled the 2Gb CF card with 400 pictures from Stratford! (gasp!)---
---
During the evening, Sarah and I had an excursion to a "non-specific" coffee shop nearby (sorry DITH, Nnydd etc2 - but my last cup was when DITH posted this on her blog!). Anyhow, the "non-specific" coffee shop has a new hot chocolate drink, and MAN! Even the normally fussy Sarah liked it.---
My first ever long exposure night photo, manual setting too! Okay I agree the composition is not very good, but that's why it's called an experiment. For this picture, I placed the 400D on top of a book on top of the roof of my parked car. I took an exposure reading using the "P" setting. It showed F5.6 and shutter speed of 4 seconds. I then went to the manual setting and set the aperture to F11 and compensated enough stops for the exposure. The result was the above picture - yesss! I can't wait to take a proper picture of something more interesting now. Oh, any tips about night photography anyone? (ISO was 200)---
Much to my amusement, PMS managed to take this shot. Compare it with this extreme photographer:D
---
---
After one whole day of experimentations with the 400D I have to say I am still struggling. Taking pictures with it is like squabbling with a friend, or wrestling. The 400D wants to take pictures one way and I wanted the pictures to turn out a different way. One thing that extremely confuses me is the Auto Exposure mode (when I set the camera to the "P" setting). Often times I feel the 400D is SEVERELY underexposing the picture. What I often had to do was switch to manual and overexpose by several stops. It really is weird ... any pointers anyone? Or was it because it was a dark, overcast day?
Anyway tips & pointers are definitely most welcome. Even from you Naja :p
ps
This shot was taken with the sun right behind me and on full AUTOMATIC mode. WT heck??
Another sample of an underexposed picture. This time under Aperture Priority mode. I set the aperture to 5.0 supposedly to make everything behind this ?goose/?swan/?duck blurry. I was hoping for magic but instead got this dark, sharp-ish picture. ???. (in other words, i was aiming for Bokeh, but got Vignette <-- sorry, photography joke)
Anyway tips & pointers are definitely most welcome. Even from you Naja :p
ps
- Great photography tutorials at photoxels: Link.
- This is a sample of what I meant by the 400D's tendency of taking underexposed photos:
This shot was taken with the sun right behind me and on full AUTOMATIC mode. WT heck??
Another sample of an underexposed picture. This time under Aperture Priority mode. I set the aperture to 5.0 supposedly to make everything behind this ?goose/?swan/?duck blurry. I was hoping for magic but instead got this dark, sharp-ish picture. ???. (in other words, i was aiming for Bokeh, but got Vignette <-- sorry, photography joke)